The Gateway Program Tunnel Crisis: Regulation, or Retribution?
In the modern world, political factions are typical. They introduce conflicting ideas that challenge a democracy. But when do diverse ideologies and thoughts become a division and positional bias that stunts a country instead of strengthening it? When a leader places the strength of his party above the welfare of the nation, how can we expect to make any positive changes to benefit our country? These questions arose in the minds of many on September 30th of 2025, when the Trump Administration ceased its payments to the Gateway Development Commission. The commission, established in 2019 under the Gateway Development Commission Act, passed through parallel legislation between New York and New Jersey. When the government carried out this budget freeze, they claimed that the Department of Transportation (DOT) was reviewing the project's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program; that same day, the Trump administration had created an Interim Final Rule that removed gender and sex-based presumptions of disadvantage. They claimed that this was reason enough to freeze the project funding and “review” the contract, declaring the DBE program as “unconstitutional” DEI (which is currently moot). New Jersey and New York labeled this “political retribution” from the president for his dislike of their liberal administrations. Although the Trump administration claimed it was due to their DBE program, the destruction they knowingly caused suggested it was about more. Trump’s DOT breached its contract, not following typical legal procedures that would have dealt with any discord without disruption. When the GDC filed a complaint against the U.S. government for breaching their contract, they held them accountable under 8 specific counts. The first 6 were declared moot (because by then DOT payments had resumed), however the last two are still active and can be used for further litigation and compensation for damages. By breaching their contract, the U.S. government violated their grant and loan agreement by failing to follow procedures and provide protection from budget overages, thereby causing costly work delays and layoffs.
The program the GDC oversees, the Gateway Program, would combat chronic congestion and delays in the northeast corridor between Newark, New Jersey and New York Penn Station. Their first phase would comprise multiple projects, the “cornerstone” being the Hudson Tunnel Project. This would build 9 miles of new rail track, and would include a new tunnel under the Hudson River; it would also rehabilitate the 116 year-old North River Tunnel. This tunnel is a great source of delay, especially since Hurricane Sandy when flooding damaged the electrical infrastructure. With a brand new tunnel, interruptions in both directions would no longer be a problem. In response to the funding freeze for the Gateway Development project, the duration of October to December of 2025 was spent tapping into credit and cash reserves, while the GDC communicated to the DOT that their DBE program and initiatives complied with federal rules; to no avail. By 2026, all credit had been exhausted. For the project to continue, the flow of federal funds needed to restart by February 6th. Three days before this deadline, the GDC filed a breach of contract lawsuit against the federal government, while New York and New Jersey filed a separate one seeking a temporary restraining order (TRO) to restart payments. A verdict was reached by the latter on the 6th, but the federal DOT seeked to block the judge, Jeanette Vargas’ order and took the case to a higher court. One thousand construction workers had to be laid off. Frustrated with the unresponsive federal government, on February 16, 2026, Mikie Sherill spoke for both states when she said “his [Trump’s] illegal actions forced the project to shut down, threw 1,000 hard-working men and women off the job, and threatened the commutes of 200,000 people
a day, Gateway was on time and on budget.” This was possibly the biggest infrastructure project in America in a century. As mentioned, the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program was the reason the Department of Transportation claimed that the budget freeze took place. In October, after the funding freeze, Director Russ Vought of the White House Office of Management and Budget claimed that the reasoning for their refusal was “to ensure funding is not flowing based on unconstitutional DEI principles.” The case of New Jersey and New York v. The United States Department of Transportation was won, however, a TRO could not be granted immediately because the DOT brought the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in an attempt to void the original verdict. When their block was denied, a TRO was finally granted, releasing $205 million to the states. Meanwhile, the breach of contract lawsuit by the GDC was declared “moot” by Judge Richard Hertling, because now that they had provided the money withheld during the freeze, he felt there was no point in further reimbursement; if needed there could be further litigation on two of the eight counts. Count VII involved the improper freeze of funds, which led to further monetary loss and damages that set the project back. The GDC aimed to claim more money for this loss. Count VIII accuses the DOT of “weaponizing federal funding for political retribution,” though it was under the guise of reviewing their DBE program. President Trump even admitted his supposedly hidden agenda, which was “really terminating tremendous numbers of Democrat projects. This is not only jobs, I mean the project in Manhattan, the project in New York. It’s billions and billions of dollars that [Chuck] Schumer has worked 20 years to get—it’s terminated.” He also said “the Gateway Project is “terminated because the Democrats are so foolish,” and “there is no funding—because it’s up to me.” Additionally, the DEI claims Vought made were false, as the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
movement was only being prevented by the threat of an executive order, not by statutory or contractual authority. Furthermore, the Interim Final Rule (removing race and sex based presumptions of social and economic disadvantage from the DOT DBE Program) could not justify breach of a contract that was made prior to these changes. Procedures exist to alter contracts to align with existing policies without freezing funding. The GDC argues that the government only has the right to withhold funds after providing 90 days’ written notice, and an opportunity to fix the problem. These procedures were ignored altogether, throwing the entire program off, which was relying on their first phase before setting up future projects. One thousand people were laid off because they could no longer be paid.
It's clear that the reasoning provided by the Trump Administration does not add up. They utilized the IFR as a pretext as well as the previous executive order (Ending Radical And Wasteful Government DEI Programs And Preferencing) in order to justify an effort to destroy the Gateway program and all democratic projects in the northeast corridor. A president that sees what is best for the nation as a whole would support a beneficial project such as this one. Even if there were good intentions in the freeze, they did not follow the proper protection procedures, costing the project an extra $156 million in damages (approximately) that have still not been paid. But we still have two counts to regain the money we lost. As Mikie Sherill says, GDC v. United States “is not finished, what we’re fighting for is some of the damages," showing that the case is still active; we are currently preparing an argument on the basis of the two remaining counts. She also assures, her administration as well as their GDC "will continue to fight, and continue to win, if Donald Trump tries to illegally stop funding again."
Bibliography
“About Gateway – Gateway Program.” n.d. The Gateway Program. Gateway Development Commission. Accessed March 15, 2026.
https://www.gatewayprogram.org/aboutgateway.html.“Gateway Program.” n.d. The Gateway Program. Gateway Development Commission. Accessed March 15, 2026.
https://www.gatewayprogram.org/.Harrington, John. 2026. “Gateway Development Commission Files Breach of Contract Claim against U.S. Government over Funding of Tunnel Project | ROI-NJ.” ROI-NJ. February 3, 2026.
https://www.roi-nj.com/2026/02/03/politics/gateway-development-commission-files-breach-of-c ontract-claim-against-u-s-government-over-funding-of-tunnel-project/.Higgs, Larry. 2026. “Trump’s Efforts to Defund This Massive Tunnel Project Linking New York and New Jersey Suffers 2 Setbacks.” NJ. March 13, 2026.
https://www.nj.com/news/2026/03/trumps-efforts-to-defund-this-massive-tunnel-project-linking new-york-and-new-jersey-suffers-2-setbacks.html.“IN the UNITED STATES COURT of FEDERAL CLAIMS.” n.d. Gateway Development Commission. Accessed March 15, 2026.
https://www.gatewayprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/20260202-GDC-COFC-Complai nt.pdf.NJOAG Communications WC. 2026. “UPDATE: New Jersey, New York Sue Trump Administration for Illegally Withholding Gateway Tunnel Funding - New Jersey Office of Attorney General.” New Jersey Office of Attorney General. February 5, 2026.
https://www.njoag.gov/update-new-jersey-new-york-sue-trump-administration-for-illegally-with holding-gateway-tunnel-funding/.Simko-Bednarski, Evan. 2026. “Judge Dismisses Most of Gateway Suit but Knocks Trump Administration for Breach of Contract.” Union-Bulletin. New York Daily News. March 12, 2026. https://www.union-bulletin.com/news/national/judge-dismisses-most-of-gateway-suit-but-knocks -trump-administration-for-breach-of-contract/article_1cdf76b0-d351-5cfb-97c0-154c1aa96023.ht ml.“State of New Jersey and State of New York v. United States Department of Transportation (Complaint).” n.d. New Jersey Office of the Attorney General. State of New Jersey, Office of the Attorney General. Accessed March 15, 2026.
https://www.gatewayprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/20260202-GDC-COFC-Complai nt.pdf.The White House. 2025. “Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing.” The White House. January 20, 2025.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/ending-radical-and-wasteful-governme nt-dei-programs-and-preferencing/.Wilson, Colleen. 2026. “After Judge Rules on Gateway Tunnel Money, Two Key Issues Remain.” North Jersey Media Group. NorthJersey.com. March 12, 2026.
https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/transportation/2026/03/12/after-judge-rules-on-gateway -tunnel-money-two-key-issues-remain/89121951007/?gnt-cfr=1&gca-cat=p&gca-uir=true&gca epti=z117714p119450l004350c119450e1170xxv117714d--66--b--66--&gca-ft=144&gca-ds=sop hi.